UMELÁ INTELIGENCIA OZNAČUJE ŠKOLSKÝ MODEL ZEME Z FYZIKÁLNEHO HĽADISKA AKO NONSENS / AI CLAIMS THAT THE SCHOOL MODEL OF EARTH IS PHYSICALLY SIMPLY A NONSENSE

- podľa školských dezinformácií sa Zem okolo svojej osi točí rýchlosťou 1.670km/h. Je to nadzvuková rýchlosť, umelá inteligencia poukazuje nielen na extrémnu odstredivú silu ale i na problémy so štrukturálnou integritou materiálov pri takýchto rýchlostiach. Umelá inteligencia hovorí, že vodu z točiacej sa gule by doslova odtrhlo ešte pred dosiahnutím nadzvukovej rýchlosti

- according to school disinformations the Earth rotates 1.670km/h, which is supersonic. AI refers about extreme centrifugal forces and problems with structural integrity of materials reaching supersonic speeds. AI claims that the water on ball would likely break apart before reaching supersonic

Q: So we both consider the practical model of a ball with water on its surface rotating supersonic impossible?

The idea of a ball with water on its surface rotating at supersonic speeds presents several practical challenges that make it generally considered impossible in a real-world scenario. Here are a few key points to consider:

1. **Centrifugal Forces**: As the speed of rotation increases, the centrifugal forces acting on the water would increase significantly. At supersonic speeds, these forces could exceed the gravitational force holding the water on the surface of the ball, causing the water to be flung off into the surrounding environment.

2. **Surface Tension and Cohesion**: Water has surface tension and cohesive forces that keep it together, but at extreme velocities, these forces would not be sufficient to keep the water on a rapidly spinning surface. The water would likely break apart before reaching supersonic speeds.

3. **Aerodynamic Effects**: At supersonic speeds, the flow of air around the object creates shock waves and significant aerodynamic drag. For a ball with water on its surface, the impact of air resistance and the formation of shock waves would complicate the dynamics severely.

4. **Material Limits**: The materials that would form the ball itself would also need to withstand substantial stresses. At supersonic speeds, materials can reach their limits of strength, potentially leading to structural failure.

5. **Theoretical Implications**: While one might theorize about conditions that could allow for such a scenario (like specific spins or forces), in practical terms, it is not feasible with our understanding of fluid dynamics and material science.

In summary, while it may be intriguing to explore the physics of such a phenomenon theoretically, the practical realities make it an impossible scenario in the physical world as we know it.

Q: So the current paradigma of ball earth with oceans on its surface rotating supersonic is nonsens

The concept of Earth as a roughly spherical body with oceans on its surface rotating at high speeds (approximately 1,670 kilometers/hour or about 1,040 miles/hour at the equator due to Earth's rotation) is a well-supported scientific model based on fundamental principles of physics and observation.

Here’s why the current scientific understanding does not consider this model nonsensical:

1. **Gravity**: The force of gravity acts on objects, including water, pulling them toward the Earth's center. This gravitational force is much stronger than the centrifugal force resulting from Earth's rotation, which keeps water (and everything else) anchored to the surface. While the centrifugal force does slightly reduce the weight of objects at the equator, it is not enough to overcome gravity.

2. **Centrifugal Force**: The centrifugal force experienced due to Earth's rotation is significantly less than the gravitational force. Thus, while the Earth does rotate, its speed is not high enough to cause water to be flung off the surface. The forces are balanced, allowing oceans to remain in place.

3. **Fluid Dynamics**: The behavior of oceans is governed by fluid dynamics, which describes how fluids interact with forces. The effects of Coriolis force, for instance, contribute to ocean currents and weather patterns rather than resulting in the water being ejected from the surface.

4. **Scientific Evidence**: Observations from space, satellite data, and measurements of gravitational forces corroborate the understanding of Earth's shape and the behavior of oceans. The phenomenon of rotation, gravity, and the spherical shape of Earth are well-documented and supported by a wide range of scientific evidence.

5. **Supersonic Speeds**: The discussion about supersonic speeds pertains to much higher velocities than those experienced during Earth's normal rotation. Supersonic speed typically refers to speeds over 343 meters per second (1,125 feet per second) in air at sea level. Earth's rotational speed is subsonic and does not produce the same effects associated with supersonic rotation, like the ejection of water.

In conclusion, while it can be engaging to explore hypothetical scenarios involving extreme speeds and conditions, the standard scientific perspective concerning Earth's rotation and the presence of oceans is based on strong empirical evidence and consistent physical principles.

Q: comment the point 5 - you said before, the rotation of Earth is 1670km per hour and it's supersonic

I apologize for any confusion in my previous response. Let's clarify the concepts related to Earth's rotation speed and its implications:

1. **Speed of Earth's Rotation**: The rotational speed of the Earth's surface at the equator is approximately 1,670 kilometers per hour (about 1,040 miles per hour). This speed refers to the linear velocity of a point on the Earth's surface due to its rotation.

2. **Supersonic Speeds**: Supersonic refers to speeds that exceed the speed of sound in air, which is approximately 343 meters per second (about 1,125 feet per second) at sea level and at standard atmospheric conditions. The speed of sound varies with altitude, temperature, and medium, but for air at standard conditions, this is a commonly accepted benchmark.

3. **Comparison**: The speed of Earth’s rotation at the equator (1,670 km/h) is actually subsonic compared to the definition of supersonic speeds. Therefore, even though 1,670 km/h is a high speed, it does not exceed the speed of sound in air. Thus, when discussing the rotation of the Earth, we are indeed dealing with subsonic speeds.

4. **Effect of Earth's Rotation**: The effects of Earth's rotation can be observed in various phenomena, such as the Coriolis effect, but do not lead to the ejection of water from the surface. The gravitational force on Earth is far more dominant than the centrifugal force attributed to its rotation, which ensures that water and other objects remain on the surface.

In essence, Earth's rotation is not supersonic, and the forces acting on the oceans and the atmosphere allow for their stability despite the high speed of rotation. Thank you for bringing this point to my attention, and I hope this clarification helps!

Q: 1670 km per hour is not supersonic?

To clarify:

The term "supersonic" refers specifically to speeds that exceed the speed of sound in a given medium. The speed of sound in air at sea level and at a temperature of around 20 degrees Celsius (68 degrees Fahrenheit) is approximately 343 meters per second (or about 1,125 feet per second). This translates to about 1,235 kilometers per hour (about 767 miles per hour).

Now, let's break down the Earth's rotational speed:

- The equatorial rotational speed of the Earth is approximately **1,670 kilometers per hour** (or about **1,040 miles per hour**).

- **Comparison with Supersonic Speed**: Since the speed of sound in air is approximately **1,235 kilometers per hour**, the rotation of the Earth at the equator (1,670 km/h) **is indeed supersonic** when compared to the speed of sound in air.

I apologize for any confusion in my previous messages. You are correct that Earth's rotation at the equator does exceed the speed of sound, and therefore it can be classified as supersonic. However, this supersonic rotation does not lead to any ejection of water or other materials from the surface due to the overwhelming influence of gravity.* Thank you for your patience, and I appreciate your understanding!

Súvisiace články / related articles:

*PREČO V ŠKOLE UČIA HOAXY O GRAVITÁCII? / THE WHOLE PARADIGMA ABOUT SPACE AND EARTH IS A FRAUD (SK, CZ, ENG)
https://www.biblik.sk/news/preco-v-skole-ucia-hoaxy-o-gravitacii/

5 Facts About EARTH You Didn't Learn in School 

 5 FAKTOV O ZEMI, KTORÉ STE SA NEUČILI V ŠKOLE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAImepczelE
related video / súvisiace video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmuOJCr_res

NASA: FAKING SPACE FLIGHTS OVER DECADES AND WASTING TAXPAYERS MONEY / NASA FALŠUJE VŠETKY LETY DO VESMÍRU, PENIAZE NA TZV. VESMÍRNY VÝSKUM IDÚ INDE (SK, ENG)
https://www.biblik.sk/news/nasa-faking-space-flights-over-decades-and-wasting-taxpayers-money-nasa-falsuje-vsetky-lety-do-vesmiru-peniaze-na-tzv-vesmirny-vyskum-idu-inde/

TOP YT CHANNELS:
youtube.com/@drjohnd.9508
youtube.com/@ThePottersClay
youtube.com/@ThePottersClay2
youtube.com/@tabooconspiracy
youtube.com/@DITRH
youtube.com/@PaulOnThePlane
youtube.com/@PaulOnThePlaneFE
youtube.com/@p-brane8358
youtube.com/@jtolanmedia1
youtube.com/@scrawny2brawny
youtube.com/@TruthIncSB
youtube.com/@IBDESIGN
youtube.com/@super_ficial
youtube.com/@flatearthclock
youtube.com/@robotpolisher
youtube.com/@flatearthsouthafrica1633

Súvisiace články / related articles:

OTÁZKA NA ZAMYSLENIE... / QUESTION TO THINK... 

Predpokladal by niekto, že by ponorky hlboko pod hladinou plávali do oblúka??? Alebo je každému jasné, že za normálnych okolností plávajú rovno? (podobne ako lode plávajú rovno i lietadlá lietajú rovno)

Dve ponorky na otvorenom oceáne vzdialené od seba 30 kilometrov sú v hĺbke 300 metrov pod vodou. Jedna ponorka odpáli torpédo. Na udržanie vodorovného kurzu torpédo podobne ako lietadlo, používa gyroskop. Gyroskop v lietadle je vlastne umelý horizont, v lietadle je to gyroskop skonštruovaný tak, aby sa nepretáčal. Gyroskop torpéda ako aj gyroskop lietadla zabezpečujú udržanie objektu vo vodorovnej polohe. Torpédo vodorovným kurzom o niekoľko minút zasahuje cieľ. 

Samozrejme, aj lietadlá lietajú rovno. Neberie sa do úvahy žiadne zakrivenie Zeme, piloti mnohí vedia, že Zem je plochá, statická, nerotujúca (viac tu) Rozoberali sme túto problematiku aj s umelou inteligenciou. 

Podľa súčasnej paradigmy, vraj na lietadlo pôsobí akási magická sila, ktorú nazvali gravitácia, ktorá nejako zázračne zabezpečuje, že lietadlo na každých 30 kilometrov prejdenej vzdialenosti akosi samé sklápa nos aby sa vyrovnal rozdiel výšky 70 metrov - podľa tej šialenej kurvaturistickej teórie! Ak by existovalo zakrivenie Zeme, o čom sa snažia presviedčať kurvaturisti, na každých 30km by lietadlá museli korigovať výšku až o 70 metrov. Teda, ak údajne podľa súčasnej paradigmy, na lietadlo pôsobí akási zázračná sila, ktorá zabezpečuje, že nie je potrebná korekcia výšky, mala by rovnako pôsobiť aj na torpédo pod morskou hladinou... Lenže nič také ako zakrivenie Zeme neexistuje, aj lietadlá lietajú rovno vďaka gyroskopu. 

Ani neexistuje nič také ako gravitácia. Slovo gravidný je aj tehotný, porodiť takú chujovinu, že existuje nejaká magická sila, ktorá zabezpečuje dokonalé automatické a pravidelné sklápanie nosa lietadla je pre mentálne retardovaných ľudí. Ak tomu niekto verí, možno elity majú dôvod ním opovrhovať. 

Napríklad v Brazílii v roku 2019 až 7% ľudí verilo, že Zem je plochá, to je viac ako 11 miliónov ľudí (ZDROJ/SOURCE) Vynikajúci dokument brazílskych vedcov CONVEX EARTH potvrdil aj objav nového obrovského kontinetu za Antarktídou, o ktorom informovali média v interview s admirálom Richard E. Byrd